Monday, February 17, 2014

Male/Female

One curious thread that runs throughout the history of Western civilization is the systematic suppression of the feminine and the amplification of the masculine.

I'm not sure that this quality has to be essential to a civilization. I suppose we have to think about the actual definition - and nature - of what a civilization is, what we want it to be. 

But it is a quality that is common to many of the great civilizations in the short time frame of agrarian and industrial human history. The great civilizations become empires; they become empires because they harden around a certain delimited and defining idea with expansionary and progressive properties, expanding outward and dominating weaker - or more peaceful - heterogeneous societies.  

The very structural basis of such an entity is of a masculine nature. Thus the corollary of its amplification is the suppression of the feminine. Is it necessary?