Monday, August 08, 2022
Bugs and Light
Fear and Loathing
It is hard to know whether to treat fear and hatred as separate entities with a life of their own, as one can observe a set of dynamics that get going with a logic of their own when they make their appearance. Take the paranoia surrounding invisible forces like viruses and then the material applications of vaccines, which are technologies that are ultimately backed by a faith in the scientific and technological methodologies that produce them.
The growing paranoia and the accompanying distrust of the sciences and technologies takes on a life of its own: it doesn't matter whether the viruses in question are real and have the natures that they do, or whether the vaccines are safe and actually work. When faced with a great enough mass of skepticism and disbelief the practical application of the suite of techniques developed to deal with such phenomena can be stalled and frustrated and ultimately rendered impotent regardless of their internal validity. Public health depends also on the public's current health, so to speak.
Does a bounded entity emerge from the built up traumas that takes on a life of its own as an embodiment of the fear and hate generated from discordant material conditions? Or is this more of a climate that arises out of the mass of associated processes, whether cultural or material?
It depends on the preferred method of analysis I suppose, with each method revealing a certain set of relations and dynamics depending on where one focuses one's attention, and different methods yield different useful truths of their own.
The ancient Greeks had their god Phobos to attempt to account for such things. How else do you make sense of the overwhelming and overpowering panic that emerges within a body of warriors beginning to experience an intense fear of defeat? As ancient sources would have it, you could have a situation in which certain key fighters could start to get beaten back, or progress further into some mortal danger, and they would begin to panic and take flight, and then that sentiment would form a weak point that would start to spread out further and further to fighters away from immediate danger, but who were taking energetic and body language ques from their comrades, and the spreading fear would become an overwhelming force of its own, and the group cohesion would disintegrate and there would soon be a general rout.
That's part of what the professionalization and all the drilling was for: to harden off that fear and that potential tendency and to snuff out the weak points before they developed, improving the group cohesion as a whole and making victory likely by smoothing out those uneven pockets of weakened will and resolve. But then even the professionalized hardening begins to break down, eaten into by more global and caustic things like the relentless drive of corruption and economic insecurity.