Monday, August 08, 2022

Bugs and Light

I've got a fair amount of things percolating at the moment, but in the meantime, I wanted to share something I've been seeing living in this sort of stick frame tent. This is the sort of observation that could be filed under simpler forms of wealth and energy usage. 

Previously we covered energy and movement: you put energy into manipulating denser masses that are themselves the products of the movement and concentration of energy, whether they be earth, timber, or stone, so that you can control the further movement of energy in the hopes of maintaining the right amounts to condition your habitat. 

This time I'd like to touch on insects. In the temperate rainforest, the movement of insects is an element of its own, comparable to the movement of wind or water. After the rains and then the growing heat in the spring and early summer, the insect population expands and the hordes of hungry gnats, flies, mosquitos, spiders, beetles, moths, and so on descend to fulfill their destinies and augment their splendor at the expense of annoyed animals everywhere, including us humans. 

They really like the cracks and crevices opened up within existing shelters of dense material, such as timber and stone, as it provides cover and protection from predators, as well as insulation, and possibly a food source, in the case of timber. And so they pass through every nook and cranny like a breath through a screen or like water seeking out paths of least resistance. They expand and contract throughout the day like exhalations and inhalations, a natural part of the forest. 

This has a direct bearing on one's preferred habitation. If you are enclosing a space for habitation, some amount of precision is preferable to get those coveted seals for blocking the movement of unwanted elements, whether its water, the passage of energy in the form of heat, or infiltration of rodents and insects that bite and annoy. Some infiltration of insect is pretty normal, even in a modern home, though with enough breaches in the building they can come and go as they please and it becomes much more noticeable. 

This is solved in several ways. The modern method is to have the maximum precision of tools and instruments and individual talent itself to cut and shape materials that are mathematically and technically formed to join as closely as possible and leave as little void as possible for unwanted elements to enter into. 

This level of precision implies a well-developed tradition of not only a mastery of the craft itself, but also tools that require a concentration of resource (the correct materials and practices for creating precision tools), the legacy of mathematics and related theory, social means of distribution of said instruments, and so on. 

Otherwise older traditional methods include the adding of resources such as packing materials like moss and other fine plant and earth materials, the proper forming of earth, stone, and timber and the joining of such with various intermediary substances, and so on, all of which are carefully selected for their resistance to insect damage and infiltration. 

Long story short, my little stick frame tent does a decent job of enclosing a space while excluding the worst of the elements, but given time and resource constraints, has plenty of gaps that can be exploited by the enterprising insect. The spiders get in through the gaps in the floor boards and I let them set up shot in the various corners to help modulate the steady flow of insects that find their way in through gaps in the loosely fitted glass and tarp-skinned walls. 

The problem announced itself most glaringly at night, when all of the moths would find their way in attracted to the light, and then have trouble getting out, flying around looking for exits to get back to the ambient moonlight outside after the artificial lights went out. This was depressing, and annoying too. Besides having moths fly at my face and eyes and mouth as I checked a computer or phone screen in the dark, finding them dead in the morning was just as discouraging, and I would try to let the stragglers out in the morning if they were still around and struggling. 

Afterwards I discovered an otherwise obvious but hitherto overlooked principle in the process: if you have a bright light that illuminates the whole space as it grows darker outside, well of course: the light is more intense and reaching more surfaces in the interior to register for the moths navigating by light, and they easily find the space navigating at night and find their way in through the various gaps to flutter about helplessly in one's face, which is both annoying and sad. 

This is solved several different ways. One continues with the well-lighted indoor environment at night, but all of the various gaps must be more thoroughly sealed, which takes a doubling down in resources in the form of precision tools, packing and joining materials, and further sealing up the space to plug up the various holes. Otherwise one can simply work with the insects and tolerate a smaller amount of them coming through, while at the same time simply use less light, especially at night as the sun goes away, and one switches to a less intense night light that is barely enough to illuminate a small part of the space without reaching every surface and advertising one's position from far away, and of course retiring with the passage of the sun. 

To generalize, it is the expenditure of energy itself that becomes magnetic, attracting more and more disparate elements. The more you use, the more you have to expend to further disperse energy used to keep those disparate and discordant elements out. 

Fear and Loathing

It is hard to know whether to treat fear and hatred as separate entities with a life of their own, as one can observe a set of dynamics that get going with a logic of their own when they make their appearance. Take the paranoia surrounding invisible forces like viruses and then the material applications of vaccines, which are technologies that are ultimately backed by a faith in the scientific and technological methodologies that produce them. 

The growing paranoia and the accompanying distrust of the sciences and technologies takes on a life of its own: it doesn't matter whether the viruses in question are real and have the natures that they do, or whether the vaccines are safe and actually work. When faced with a great enough mass of skepticism and disbelief the practical application of the suite of techniques developed to deal with such phenomena can be stalled and frustrated and ultimately rendered impotent regardless of their internal validity. Public health depends also on the public's current health, so to speak. 

Does a bounded entity emerge from the built up traumas that takes on a life of its own as an embodiment of the fear and hate generated from discordant material conditions? Or is this more of a climate that arises out of the mass of associated processes, whether cultural or material? 

It depends on the preferred method of analysis I suppose, with each method revealing a certain set of relations and dynamics depending on where one focuses one's attention, and different methods yield different useful truths of their own. 

The ancient Greeks had their god Phobos to attempt to account for such things. How else do you make sense of the overwhelming and overpowering panic that emerges within a body of warriors beginning to experience an intense fear of defeat? As ancient sources would have it, you could have a situation in which certain key fighters could start to get beaten back, or progress further into some mortal danger, and they would begin to panic and take flight, and then that sentiment would form a weak point that would start to spread out further and further to fighters away from immediate danger, but who were taking energetic and body language ques from their comrades, and the spreading fear would become an overwhelming force of its own, and the group cohesion would disintegrate and there would soon be a general rout. 

That's part of what the professionalization and all the drilling was for: to harden off that fear and that potential tendency and to snuff out the weak points before they developed, improving the group cohesion as a whole and making victory likely by smoothing out those uneven pockets of weakened will and resolve. But then even the professionalized hardening begins to break down, eaten into by more global and caustic things like the relentless drive of corruption and economic insecurity.